Posted on
November 06, 2010 by
Alexander Douglas

Big Brother and Gymnastics
The November/December 2010 – Vol 30 #10 issue of the USAG professional journal called “Technique” magazine finally gave an extensive explanation of why they are performing background checks on all members who join the USAG. According to the blurb inserted into the article by Marcia Bradford, “USA Gymnastics embraced the process of background checks in 2007, following the U.S. Olympic Committee’s decision to use NCSI for this process prior to the 2007 Pan-American Games.”
The claim of the article is that the background checks are being made to protect the children in organized sports from sexual predators. Having coached gymnastics for 35 years, I know that this is a legitimate issue, so I am not dismissing that problem in this post. Rather I am questioning the method for dealing with the problem.
She uses the bowling organization as an example of one of the first to tackle this issue through background checks by Jeff Breidenbach, director of planning for the United States Bowling Congress (USBC). Through his own registered volunteer program (RVP) to keep predators out of the organization the “good guys” were identified.
As part of the effort, volunteers who are approved through the background checks are given badges that must be worn at USBC events, Breidenbach said. “These offer a visible symbol of assurance to parents and others involved that these people, who work with the children, have passed the background screening process.”
Seems like a reverse of the Scarlet Letter by Nathanael Hawthorn, or a reverse of Nazi Germany forcing the Jews to wear yellow arm bands. But the end result is the same: those not wearing the badges are assumed to be sexual predators, whether they are or not. Besides, how hard would it be for a sexual predator to make one his own badges, thus creating a false sense of security in the families because they see a badge? Badges mean nothing. However, this is not what the USAG or NCSI are doing.
I have to ask the question: do they really care about preventing sexual abuse or is there another matter? If this is the legitimate concern, then why did we not see this kind of background check on coaches in the 1980′s when coaches routinely verbally abused children in the gym in the name of gaining the competitive lead over other clubs and countries? I saw that abuse first hand and I know there are a multitude of mothers today who were traumatized by their coaches when they were young.
Frankly, resent the background check. It has an extremely un-American feel about it.
- It presumes we are all guilty of sexual predation until proven innocent. This is not how our Constitutional judicial system works, neither should private companies function this way.
- It is a violation of our 5th Amendment rights against self-incrimination. The burden of proof falls on the USAG and NCSI to prove that we are guilty since they are the ones questioning us.
- As such, it adds insult to injury that we have to pay for this self vindication in order to join the USAG.
We are being forced in a direction that most Americans don’t want to go. We are presumed guilty of terrorism every time we go through airport guilty. We are watched by video cameras in every place we go, and are even now being ticketed by cameras at intersections. No one trusts who we are and require identification for every purchase with credit cards and checks. I don’t understand the scrutiny that Costco and Sams places on us, either. We cant get in without their membership card. We can’t buy without the membership card, then we have to show our receipts when we leave as though we snuck in and stole the merchandise.
I recently found out that many red light cameras are installed by foreign companies who split the revenue gained by the tickets. One company is from Australia who installed the cameras here in Texas.
Honestly, I think the USAG adopted the background check on their members because of fear of lawsuits. Nissan stopped making trampolines because of lawsuits. Tort lawyers look for everyone they can name who has money to blame for injuries. I suspect, although I do not know, that the USAG had one too many lawsuits from parents whose child was sexual abused by a gymnastics coach.
I also know that many of the fear driven campaigns have their origin in the international arena. The USAG obtained their standing in the USA because they had gained the FIG sanction, and there was no other organization that was allowed to send athletes to the Olympics. I suspect that every national organization in countries around the world are engaging in these background checks just as we are in this country. This smells too much like an international agenda.